|
Quiz 1 Chapter 21 problems: 11*, 12*,
13, 15*, 16*, 21*, 22*, 24*, 25*, 26*, 27*, 28*, 35*, 36*, 38*,
42*, 61* |
| Big application: photocopy machines-http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Photocopier |
|
Simulation: Click here for the motion of an electron in a uniform electric field. |
| Masteringphysics.com: COURSE ID = PHYSICSCALI4BFALL10 |
|
11. q1 + q2 = QT and F = k*q1*q2 / d2. (a) F = (QT - q2)*q2 / d2 is a minimum. Differentiate with respect to q2 , set the expression equal to zero and solve for q2 and q1 . There will be two solutions for q2 corresponding to the minimum and the maximum. To tell the difference, evaluate the second derivative for each solution. Review Math 1 and 2 ! |
| 12. This should be an easy problem. Please
email with comments on this exercise. What gave you
trouble?
Here are some suggestions: Label the charges, starting from the
left, as 1, 2 and 3. |
| 13. Hints later. Use the component method shown in 15 and 16 below but applied to an equilateral triangle in which the internal angles are 60 degrees. |
|
15. Please email with comments on this exercise. What
gave you trouble? I can say this: Each of the 4 forces points away from the center along a diagonal. Let us label the charges counterclockwise starting from the charge in the upper right corner, which we will call charge q1. Without loss of generality, let us find the net force on that charge using the component method . F1NETx = F12 + F13cos45. F1NETy = F13sin45 + F14. Note: a = 0.100 m and 4.15x10-3 C = q1
= q2 = q3 = q4
. |
|
16. Please email with comments on this exercise. What
gave you trouble? Note: a = 0.100 m and 4.15x10-3 C = | q1 |
= | q2 | = | q3 |= | q4 |
|
| 21. Hint: The force is opposite the electric field . See Tipers Excecise ET5-CRT1. |
| 22. Hint: The force is in the same direction as the electric field . See Tipers Excecise ET5-CRT1 as a contrast. |
| 24. See the previous two hints. Which one of these hints applies here? |
| 25. Use unit vector notation; see previous three hints. |
| 26. Use unit vector notation; see previous four hints. |
| 27. Hint: The force is opposite the electric field . See Tipers Excecise ET5-CRT1. Find the magnitude of the force and use Newton's Second Law to find the magnitude of the acceleration. How do the directions of the acceleration and the field compare? Are they in the same or opposite directions? |
| 28.
Net electric field has magnitude : F1NET = k|q1|/(0.040)2
+ k|q2|/(0.040)2 , where
-8x10-6 C = q1 and 7x10-6
C = q2 .
We assume that q2 is on the right end and q1
is on the left end of the horizontal segment between the two
charges. Note the sum above is positive. What is the direction of the net force, left or right? |
| 35. For starters, read Section 21-11 carefully and see the derivations leading to equations 21-11 and 21-12. However, Problem 35 evaluates the field on the central axis between the charges, which requires a different solution. More on this later. The distance between P and + Q is x + a. The distance between P and -Q is x - a. The net electric field clearly points left since the negative charge is closer. The magnitude of the net electric field is ENET = E- - E+ , where E- is the magnitude of the electric field due to the negative charge -Q and E+ is the magnitude of the electric field due to the positive charge +Q. Each one of these magnitudes have the form of equation 21-4b. The denominators are x + a and x - a. Insert into the formulae for the magnitude of the electric field and then and subtract. |
| 36. Find x by setting E- - E+ = 0, where E- is the magnitude of the electric field due to the negative charge Q1 and E+ is the magnitude of the electric field due to the positive charge Q2. The distance between P and Q1 is x. The distance between P and Q2 is x + 0.12 cm. Each one of these magnitudes have the form of equation 21-4b. The denominators contain x and x + 0.12 cm, each raised to the second power. Insert into the formulae for the magnitude of the electric field and then subtract, set expression to zero and solve for x. After simplifying you may have a quadratic equation in x in standard form. |
| 38. At origin O, the direction of the field due
to the charge at A is down. The direction of the field due to the
charge at B is thirty degrees with the negative x-axis: ENETx = - EBcos30. ENETy = -EA - EB.sin30. Note that the magnitudes are equal: EA = EB . |
| 42. See the book's example. Look closely at Figure 21-34 b. The field at
point A will point vertically upward along the positive y-axis.
The field at point B will be in the first quadrant of a
right-handed x-y coordinate system. Here is a hint for point A: ENETx = 0. ENETy = 2*Ecos (theta) Theta = tan-1(5/10) . Note that E = kQ/(0.052 + 0.102)1/2 . Here is a hint for point B: ENETx is not zero. ENETy is positive. |
| 61. This is interesting and the most
powerful of the entire homework: the simple harmonic
oscillation of a charged particle. The
problem's model contains, however, one big departure
from the actual oscillation of molecules in solids. Real oscillations
are not symmetric about the local origin where the force momentarily
is zero (at equilibrium). Consider equilibrium position x = 0 in the excitation of a mass attached to a
horizontal spring and thus under the influence of Hooke's
force F = -kx leading to symmetric motion about the origin.
In real solids, the amplitude would be double valued in that an asymmetric spring swings
further to the left, say, than to the right before momentarily
coming to rest and turning around. This asymmetry
accounts for the expansion of solids when they are heated as you
will discover in 4C. For further info , visit:
http://homepage.mac.com/phyzman/phyz/BOP/2-06ADHT/G-Thermal_Expansion.pdf and read to the bottom the document. For posterity, you may want to download the page into your hard drive as I did for future reference. Required reading. The is a lucid application of the course to stable, ubiquitous electro-static oscillations in solids. In any event you want to show the x-component of force F may be written as F = -Cx, where C is a positive constant. Clearly the charged particle is attracted back the the ring whether the value of x is positive or negative: we would thus write, F = q*E, where E is the x-component of electric field
given by the solution to the charged ring but with some qualifications. We obtained the
formula for E, but be mindful in this case the charge symbol
Q would be replaced by F = m*d^2x/dt^2 = m*acceleration, where b^2 is the expression b for squared. One question you might to ask. What if the particle was oscillating in a vertical gravitational field? Would the gravitational force on the particle influence the problem in a significant way? |